G. MOUTINHO: RISK REPORT MAY 14 / 2021 (PROVED)

  

 

G.MOUTINHO: RISK ANALYSIS MAY 14 / 2021


  • INTL PROCEDURE/ REASONS by LAW 13 CP with arts. 74, 23 I CF / Possible violation: art. 174 CF (State; Gov, corp. peers)
  • EVIDENCING OFFENDER GROUP ;  silence and not proper info art. 313-A, 359-A ss CP ; WCC Law and others

    • Modified Data at stochastic sys as SIAFI; SIDOR, SIOP, other public Sys as data base implies systematical and incremental worng-doing. It can be considered aleatory. 
    • QRM = [+11(-11) = 00(+11)] ; ALL PLAYERS AT ART. 174 MIGHT BE CONSIDERD GUILTY BY CIRCUNSTANCES, IF GOT CONFIRMED AGAIN AT THIS RISK ANALYSIS.
    • Ilicit workflow only exis If you didn´t have disruptive procedure, despite complained (finalism of  silence) - for instance: dismiss/ destitute/ impeachment, etc. 
    • REASON BY LAW: art. 13, 313-a, 359-a ss CP WITH ART. 74, 23 I + 144, 4º IX CF and US Cont. Preamble at Sec. Forum. / Law 12.850/13


    • for instance: Is It possible the existence of concurrent interest based not accomplishment of art. 174 CF considering the impact at Intl. Sec. Intl. Fin. and Global Economy to Keep ilicit advantages by risk or silence with finalism as "Blind-eye" association at TOC scheme ?

    • (  ) 11 Possible ; try to read and understand the written signs at Law 12.850/2013. Are the Local Prosecutors at the scheme ?
    • (  ) 00 Not Possible => see art. 313-A CP; 359-A ss CP, art. 809 and 239 CPP with art. 116 Law 8.112/90 and art. 85 CF

PRESENTATION of REASONS: https://youtu.be/EuYU_bYd2kk


IN ALL CASES WE HAVE EXPOSED RISK ASSOCIATED WITH NOT LOYAL BEHAVIOR AND PROVING (formal and logical way) BECAUSE IT´S A FACT UNDER NOTORIETY PERCEPTION; COMPLAINED AT LEAST TWICE AND UNDER CONTINUITY BY VARIANCY. THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM CHANGE VARIABLES, BUT KEPT THE ACTION BY PUBLIC CORRUPTION. DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELVES A CRIMINAL ARRAY AS LOCAL PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND ASSOCIATED AT TOC SCHEME OFFENDERS ? - GENERAL LEGAL SUPPORT: ART. 5º XLI, XLVI  BRA CONST. ; CONFIRMED BY ART. 5º LXXII (PROTECTION OF DATA).


POSSIBLE RISK: DUPLICITY OF REGISTRY BY SIMULATIONS AT P2P SCHEME and REQUESTING OF COMPENSATION as VICTIM with LAW ENFORCEMENT ANTI-CRIME BUDGET. SUGGESTED TO HAVE ECONOMICAL AND FINANCIAL INFO BY INTL. SECURITY PURPOSE DOING REQUERIMENTS BY WCC AND TOC LAW BRA AND OBSERVING:

  • ART. 5º XXII, XLI, LXXII CF  ABOUT SOME GUARANTEES OF THE CREDIT (IT´S UNDER PROTECTION BECAUSE EXIST).


CONCLUSIVE RESEARCH (Closed and delivered)
 



... at my private-room, may day 14 /2021.
CGQ. MOUTINHO (Independent Effort)